Set emissions reduction targets aligned with climate science through the Science Based Targets initiative. Demonstrate credible net zero commitment and join over 2,000 companies worldwide in science-based climate action.
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) is a partnership between CDP, UN Global Compact, World Resources Institute (WRI) and WWF that enables companies to set emissions reduction targets aligned with climate science.
Targets consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels
Rigorous technical assessment ensures targets meet scientific criteria
Short-term emissions reduction targets aligned with limiting warming to 1.5°C.
Key Requirements:
Long-term net zero targets covering all emissions sources and sinks.
Key Requirements:
Complete net zero framework combining near and long-term targets.
Key Requirements:
Public commitment to set science-based targets within 24 months.
Key Activities:
Develop science-based targets using approved methodologies.
Key Activities:
Submit targets to SBTi for independent validation.
Key Activities:
Independent technical assessment by SBTi experts.
Key Activities:
SBTi announces approved targets publicly.
Key Activities:
Annual progress reporting to maintain SBTi status.
Key Activities:
SBTi targets signal credible climate commitments to ESG-focused investors and lenders.
Impact:
73% of institutional investors consider SBTi targets in investment decisions
Differentiate your business with science-based climate leadership and credible net zero commitments.
Impact:
2,000+ companies committed globally, creating competitive differentiation
Meet increasing customer and supply chain requirements for science-based climate targets.
Impact:
60% of SBTi companies require suppliers to set their own science-based targets
Prepare for evolving climate regulations and mandatory target-setting requirements.
Impact:
EU and UK considering mandatory science-based targets for large companies
Drive operational efficiency and cost savings through systematic emissions reduction.
Impact:
Average 7% annual cost savings from energy efficiency and optimization
Systematic approach to managing climate-related business risks and opportunities.
Impact:
Enhanced resilience to carbon pricing, regulation, and supply chain disruption
| Sector | Approach | Target Type | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
Financial Services | Financed Emissions | Portfolio decarbonization targets using SBTi Financial Sector guidance | 15-25 years for full portfolio net zero |
Oil & Gas | Absolute Contraction | Scope 1, 2 and sold product emissions with specific guidance for fossil fuel companies | 10-15 years with interim milestones |
Aviation | Sectoral Pathway | Aviation-specific methodology accounting for operational and technology constraints | 2030 and 2050 targets aligned with sectoral decarbonization |
Steel & Cement | Physical Intensity | Production-based intensity targets reflecting technological pathways | 2030 targets with long-term net zero by 2050 |
Power Generation | Emission Factor | Electricity generation emission intensity targets based on renewable transition | 2030 targets for rapid decarbonization |
Other Sectors | Absolute or Intensity | General cross-sector guidance with flexibility for sector-specific considerations | 5-15 years depending on sector characteristics |
Measuring and setting targets for value chain emissions is complex and resource-intensive.
Solution Approach:
Phased approach starting with material categories, using industry collaboration and supplier engagement.
Insufficient or poor-quality emissions data undermines target credibility.
Solution Approach:
Invest in robust data collection systems, third-party verification, and continuous improvement processes.
Securing organizational commitment to ambitious targets and required investments.
Solution Approach:
Business case development highlighting financial benefits, risk mitigation, and stakeholder requirements.
Risk of not meeting approved targets due to implementation challenges.
Solution Approach:
Detailed implementation roadmap with interim milestones, regular monitoring, and course correction mechanisms.
SBTi methodologies evolve, requiring target updates and recalculation.
Solution Approach:
Stay current with SBTi guidance, build flexibility into target design, plan for periodic reviews.
The first step is making a public commitment to set science-based targets within 24 months. This demonstrates leadership and begins the journey toward validated climate targets.